Airbus A319 vs A320, these are two popular planes from the Airbus family, each with its own special features. The A319 is smaller and great for shorter trips, saving fuel and fitting into smaller airports. The A320 is a bit bigger, perfect for carrying more passengers on busier flights. Both are made by Airbus, a company known for making safe and comfortable planes. This article will take a closer look at these two planes to see what makes each one good for different kinds of flights.
Airbus A319 vs A320
When you look at the Airbus A319 vs A320, they’re like two close family members who are a bit different from each other. The A319 is smaller, being only 33.84 meters long, while the A320 is longer at 37.57 meters. This size difference means the A319 has fewer seats, holding up to 160 people, compared to the A320’s 180 seats. Even though they’re both the same width and height, the smaller A319 doesn’t hold as much stuff or as many cargo pallets.
One cool thing about the A319 is that it can fly farther – up to 6,850 km, which is more than the A320’s 6,200 km. They both zoom at the same speed, but the A320 can take a bit more weight and has a bigger fuel tank. Basically, the A319 is perfect if you need a smaller plane that’s good on fuel for shorter trips, and the A320 is a better pick if you have more people or things to fly.
Comparison Table: Airbus A319 vs A320
| Specification | Airbus A319 | Airbus A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Length | 33.84 m | 37.57 m |
| Cabin Length | 23.78 m | 27.51 m |
| Fuselage Width | 3.95 m | 3.95 m |
| Max Cabin Width | 3.70 m | 3.70 m |
| Wing Span | 35.80 m | 35.80 m |
| Height | 11.76 m | 11.76 m |
| Track | 7.59 m | 7.59 m |
| Wheelbase | 11.04 m | 12.64 m |
| Max Seating Capacity | 160 | 180 |
| Typical Seating (2-Class) | 120-150 | 140-170 |
| Cargo LD3 Capacity Underfloor | 4 LD3-45W + 2.3 m³ bulk | 7 LD3-45W |
| Max Pallet Number Underfloor | 4 | 7 |
| Water Volume | 32 m³ | 44 m³ |
| Range | 6,850 km | 6,200 km |
| Maximum Speed (Mmo) | M0.82 | M0.82 |
| Max Ramp Weight | 75.90 tonnes | 78.40 tonnes |
| Max Take-Off Weight | 75.50 tonnes | 78.00 tonnes |
| Max Landing Weight | 63.90 tonnes | 66.00 tonnes |
| Max Zero Fuel Weight | 60.30 tonnes | 62.50 tonnes |
| Max Fuel Capacity | 26,730 litres | 27,200 litres |
Airbus A319
The Airbus A319 is a really interesting plane that first flew into the skies in 25 August 1995. It’s part of the famous Airbus A320 family, known for being reliable and comfortable for passengers. What’s cool about the A319 is how flexible it is with seating. Depending on what the airline needs, it can have anywhere from 110 seats to as many as 160 seats. No matter how the seats are arranged, the A319 is designed to make sure passengers have a comfortable flight. It’s not too big, so it’s perfect for airlines that don’t need to carry a lot of people but still want to give them a good flying experience. The A319 has been a popular choice for many airlines because of this versatility and comfort.
Airbus A320
The Airbus A320 first took to the skies in 1988 and quickly became a game-changer for short to medium flights. It’s really popular because it makes flying comfortable. Inside, the A320 can be set up in different ways, usually seating between 140 and 170 people, but it can squeeze in up to 180 if needed. This flexibility is great for airlines since they can use the same plane for different kinds of trips. But the best part is, no matter how it’s set up, it keeps passengers comfy, which is a big reason why so many airlines and travelers love it. That’s why the A320 is known as one of the best planes out there for these kinds of flights.
Airbus A319 vs A320 Engines
When we talk about the engines of the Airbus A319 and A320, it’s pretty interesting because they are quite similar. Both planes use either CFM International LEAP-1A or Pratt & Whitney PW1100G engines. These engines are known for being really good at saving fuel, which is great for the environment and helps airlines save money on fuel costs.
The cool thing is, even though these engines are the same in both planes, the smaller size of the A319 means it can use a bit less fuel compared to the A320. So, both planes are great at being fuel-efficient, but the A319 is just a little bit better at it because of its size. This makes both planes a good choice for airlines that care about fuel costs and want to be more eco-friendly.
Airbus A319 vs A320 Fuel Comparison
When we look at how the Airbus A319 and A320 use fuel, there are some interesting points to note. Both planes are known for being good with fuel, the A319 is great for saving fuel on a smaller scale, while the A320, though it uses a bit more fuel, is still efficient and can cover longer distances. Both are good choices if you’re looking to be mindful about fuel use and costs.
Airbus A319 Fuel Capacity
- The A319 can hold between 24,210 to 30,190 liters of fuel.
- It’s pretty efficient, promising to save up to 15% in fuel.
- The total fuel capacity is 61,010 pounds, and it can fly about 4,800 miles (4,170 nautical miles) on a full tank.
- The fuel is stored in a center tank and four wing tanks. Each wing has an outer and inner tank, with the inner ones holding most of the fuel.
- The A319 uses its fuel smartly, fitting it into a slightly smaller plane.
Airbus A320 Fuel Capacity
- The A320 has a fuel capacity of 23,858 liters.
- It burns around 2,700 to 3,000 pounds of fuel per hour, which is about 400-450 gallons.
- For a long-haul flight, fueling an A320 can cost between $2,000 to $4,000 per hour.
- In terms of efficiency, a 150-seat A320 flying from Los Angeles to New York City would use about 11,608 kg of fuel, or 2.43 liters per 100 kilometers per seat.
- Generally, the A320 consumes about 2,200 to 2,600 kilograms of fuel per hour.
Cabins And Capacity
The Airbus A319 and A320 are like two siblings in the airplane world, with the A319 being the smaller one. It can seat up to 160 passengers, usually in a layout of 120-150 seats, and can carry 4 big cargo boxes under the floor. Its water tank holds 32 cubic meters. The bigger A320, however, can seat up to 180 passengers in a 140-170 seat configuration, carry 7 cargo boxes, and has a larger water tank of 44 cubic meters. So, if you need more room for passengers and luggage, the A320 is your go-to, but for smaller groups and shorter trips, the A319 does the job well.
This table shows the differences in seating, cargo, and other capacities between the A319 and A320, making it clear that the A320 offers more space overall.
| Feature | Airbus A319 | Airbus A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Seating | 160 passengers | 180 passengers |
| Typical Seating (2-Class) | 120-150 passengers | 140-170 passengers |
| Cargo Capacity Underfloor | 4 LD3-45W + 2.3 m³ bulk | 7 LD3-45W |
| Max Pallet Number Underfloor | 4 | 7 |
| Water Volume | 32 m³ | 44 m³ |
Airbus A319 vs A320: Performance Comparison
When we look at how the Airbus A319 and A320 perform, it’s interesting to see their differences. The A319 has a longer range, flying up to 6,850 km, which is more than the A320’s 6,200 km. This means the A319 can travel a bit farther without stopping. Both planes fly at the same top speed, but the A320 is stronger in carrying more weight. It can take off and land with more weight than the A319. Also, the A320 can hold a bit more fuel, with a tank size of 27,200 liters compared to the A319’s 26,730 liters. So, while the A319 is great for longer trips, the A320 is the go-to for carrying more stuff and more fuel, perfect for airlines that need that extra capacity.
When we compare the performance of the Airbus A319 and A320, there are a few key points to consider.
| Specification | Airbus A319 | Airbus A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 6,850 km | 6,200 km |
| Maximum Operating Speed (Mmo) | M0.82 | M0.82 |
| Max Ramp Weight | 75.90 tonnes | 78.40 tonnes |
| Max Take-Off Weight | 75.50 tonnes | 78.00 tonnes |
| Max Landing Weight | 63.90 tonnes | 66.00 tonnes |
| Max Zero Fuel Weight | 60.30 tonnes | 62.50 tonnes |
| Max Fuel Capacity | 26,730 litres | 27,200 litres |
Airbus A319 vs A320 Dimensions
When comparing the sizes of the Airbus A319 and A320, the first thing you’ll notice is that the A320 is a bit longer. Its overall length is 37.57 meters, which is longer than the A319’s 33.84 meters. This extra length means the A320’s cabin is also longer, making it more spacious for passengers. Both planes are the same width though, and they have the same wingspan, so from the outside, they look quite similar in width. They’re also the same height. But the A320 has a longer wheelbase because of its longer body. In simple terms, the A320 is like a stretched version of the A319, giving it more room inside for passengers and cargo.
Let’s take a look at how the Airbus A319 and A320 differ in Dimensions.
| Specification | Airbus A319 | Airbus A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Length | 33.84 m | 37.57 m |
| Cabin Length | 23.78 m | 27.51 m |
| Fuselage Width | 3.95 m | 3.95 m |
| Max Cabin Width | 3.70 m | 3.70 m |
| Wing Span | 35.80 m | 35.80 m |
| Height | 11.76 m | 11.76 m |
| Track | 7.59 m | 7.59 m |
| Wheelbase | 11.04 m | 12.64 m |
Airbus A319 vs A320 Price Comparison
When you look at the prices of the Airbus A319 and A320, you can see that the A320 is a bit more expensive when it’s brand new, starting at around $101 million. This price can go up if you add extra features or customizations. But if you’re looking at a used A320, it’s a lot cheaper, with the average price being around $25 million.
On the other hand, the average price for a brand-new A319 is about $78,761,000. It’s a bit tricky to find the exact price for a used A319, but if you were to take out a loan for one over 120 months, it would come to an average payment of around $39,380,500.
| Aircraft | New Price | Average Used Price |
|---|---|---|
| Airbus A319 | $78,761,000 (average) | $39,380,500 (average loan over 120 months) |
| Airbus A320 | $101 million | $25 million |
So, in simple terms, a new A320 costs more than a new A319. However, if you’re looking at used planes, the A320 seems to be more affordable. This difference in price is something airlines might think about when deciding which plane to buy.
Conclusion
In summary, the Airbus A319 and A320 offer different advantages depending on what an airline needs. The A319 is more suited for shorter routes and smaller passenger loads, making it a cost-effective option for regional flights. It’s also a bit more affordable than the A320. The A320, however, with its larger size and greater capacity, is ideal for busier routes. It can carry more passengers and offers more flexibility in terms of range and cargo space. When it comes to buying, a new A320 is more expensive than a new A319, but second-hand A320s are quite affordable. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements of the airline, including route lengths, passenger numbers, and budget considerations.
FAQs
Q: What’s the main difference between the Airbus A319 and A320?
A: The main difference is size and capacity. The A320 is larger and can carry more passengers compared to the A319.
Q: Is the Airbus A319 cheaper than the A320?
A: Yes, generally, a brand-new A319 is cheaper than a new A320. For used models, the A320 tends to be more affordable.
Q: Can the Airbus A319 fly longer routes than the A320?
A: The A319 and A320 have similar ranges, but the A319 is slightly more efficient on shorter routes due to its smaller size.
Q: Which plane is better for larger passenger loads?
A: The Airbus A320 is better for larger passenger loads, as it has a higher seating capacity compared to the A319.
Q: Are both the A319 and A320 suitable for regional airlines?
A: Yes, both are suitable for regional airlines, but the A319 might be more cost-effective for shorter routes with fewer passengers.
