Dreams take flight as these engineering marvels, Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319, redefine the skies with cutting-edge technology, unrivaled performance, and a legacy of aviation excellence
Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319
The Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319, integral members of the Airbus A320 Family, epitomize the pinnacle of single-aisle aircraft design. Sharing a common optimized cabin cross-section, they offer unparalleled passenger comfort with generous seat width and an extra-wide aisle, facilitating swift turnarounds. The cockpit commonality between the two not only reduces training and operational costs but enhances pilot flexibility through Cross-Crew-Qualification (CCQ).
The Airbus A319, with its shorter fuselage, excels in versatility, accommodating 110 to 160 passengers, while the larger Airbus A320 caters to 150-180 passengers. The A319neo, featuring Sharklets and advanced engine choices, underscores Airbus’ commitment to efficiency, boasting a 30% reduction in fuel burn and extended flight ranges. In the aviation arena, these aircraft soar as symbols of innovation, each offering a unique blend of performance, adaptability, and passenger-centric design.
| Feature | A319ceo | A319neo | A320ceo | A320neo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Length | 33.84 m | 33.84 m | 37.57 m | 37.57 m |
| Cabin Length | 23.78 m | 23.78 m | 27.51 m | 27.51 m |
| Fuselage Width | 3.95 m | 3.95 m | 3.95 m | 3.95 m |
| Max Cabin Width | 3.70 m | 3.70 m | 3.70 m | 3.70 m |
| Wing Span (Geometric) | 35.80 m | 35.80 m | 35.80 m | 35.80 m |
| Height | 11.76 m | 11.76 m | 11.76 m | 11.76 m |
| Track | 7.59 m | 7.59 m | 7.59 m | 7.59 m |
| Wheelbase | 11.04 m | 11.04 m | 12.64 m | 12.64 m |
| Pax Max Seating | 156 | 160 | 180 | 194 |
| Typical Seating 2-class | 110-140 | 120-150 | 140-170 | 150-180 |
| Cargo LD3 Capacity Underfloor | 4 LD3-45W + 2.3 m³ bulk | 4 LD3-45W + 2.3 m³ bulk | 7 LD3-45W | 7 LD3-45W |
| Max Pallet Number Underfloor | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Water Volume | 32 m³ | 32 m³ | 44 m³ | 44 m³ |
| Range | 6,950 km (with Sharklets) | 6,850 km | 6,200 km (with Sharklets) | 6,300 km |
| Mmo (Maximum Mach Operating) | M0.82 | M0.82 | M0.82 | M0.82 |
| Max Ramp Weight | 75.90 tonnes | 75.90 tonnes | 78.40 tonnes | 79.40 tonnes |
| Max Take-off Weight | 75.50 tonnes | 75.50 tonnes | 78.00 tonnes | 79.00 tonnes |
| Max Landing Weight | 62.50 tonnes | 63.90 tonnes | 66.00 tonnes | 67.40 tonnes |
| Max Zero Fuel Weight | 58.50 tonnes | 60.30 tonnes | 62.50 tonnes | 64.30 tonnes |
| Max Fuel Capacity | 30,190 litres | 26,730 litres | 27,200 litres | 26,730 litres |
Airbus A320
Welcome to the world of Airbus A320, the aircraft that has transformed air travel! It’s not just a plane; it’s a symbol of comfort and excellence in short-to-medium-haul flights. Loved by passengers and airlines alike, the A320 is renowned for its cozy cabins and innovative features. With over 8,600 orders received by the end of 2021, it’s clear that this aircraft is a game-changer. Let’s take a closer look at its dimensions, cool features, and why it’s considered a pioneer in making flying a more enjoyable experience. Get ready to discover why the Airbus A320 is not just a plane but a flying marvel!
List of Variants of Airbus A320 Family.
- Airbus A320ceo
- Airbus A320neo
Airbus A319
The Airbus A319, a member of the A320 Family, offers versatility with seating options from 110 to 160 passengers. With optimized dimensions and a wide fuselage, it ensures top-notch comfort. The A319 benefits from cockpit commonality and the revolutionary fly-by-wire control system, minimizing training and maintenance costs. The A319neo, equipped with Sharklet wingtip devices and advanced engines, achieves a remarkable 30% reduction in fuel burn compared to previous models, extending its range and enhancing performance for a more efficient and eco-friendly air travel experience.
List of Airbus A319 Variants.
- Airbus A319ceo
- Airbus A319neo
Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319 Variants
The initial A320 aircraft were designated as A320-100s, with only around twenty units manufactured. Following this, Airbus introduced an upgraded version, the A320-200, featuring increased fuel capacity and extended range, thanks to special wingtip enhancements. In 2016, the A320neo, a more advanced model, took to the skies commercially, boasting improved engines and fuel-saving sharklet wingtips, resulting in a remarkable 20% increase in fuel efficiency per seat.
The A319, a slightly smaller variant than the A320, made its debut in 1996. Additionally, there’s an extended-range version called the A319LR, tailored for longer journeys and offering more premium seating options, first introduced in 2003 with Qatar Airways.
The latest addition to the family, the A319neo, commenced passenger flights in early 2022, bringing with it contemporary features and enhanced efficiency to the aviation landscape.
Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319 Engines
When we compare the engines of the Airbus A320 and Airbus A319, it’s important to note that both planes use similar engines, making things easier for maintenance and how they operate. Let’s take a quick look at the engines in these two planes:
Engines in Airbus A320
The Airbus A320 comes with different types of engines, like the International Aero Engines (IAE) V2500 and the CFM International CFM56 series. These engines are well-known for being reliable, fuel-efficient, and high-performing. The newer A320neo model has even more advanced engine options, such as the Pratt & Whitney PurePower PW1100G-JM and the CFM International LEAP-1A. These newer engines bring significant improvements in using fuel efficiently and being kinder to the environment, making the A320neo a more eco-friendly choice.
Engines in Airbus A319
Similar to the A320, the Airbus A319 also has engine options like the IAE V2500 and CFM International CFM56 series. The upgraded A319neo version introduces modern engines, including the Pratt & Whitney PurePower PW1100G-JM and CFM International LEAP-1A. These engines contribute to using fuel more efficiently and having a smaller impact on the environment, supporting the aviation industry’s efforts towards sustainability.
Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319 Fuel Comparison
When comparing the fuel efficiency of the Airbus A320 and A319, both aircraft exhibit commendable performance, but variations exist due to their size and intended use. The A320, being larger, generally consumes slightly more fuel than the A319. On average, the A320 has a fuel consumption rate of around 2,800 to 3,300 gallons per hour, while the A319’s consumption ranges from 2,200 to 2,600 gallons per hour. The A320 has a higher fuel capacity, with tanks holding approximately 26,730 liters, compared to the A319’s capacity of about 26,730 liters. The larger fuel capacity of the A320 allows it to cover longer distances, with a typical range of 6,300 kilometers, whereas the A319 has a range of approximately 6,850 kilometers. This fuel comparison showcases the nuanced trade-off between size, capacity, and efficiency in these two popular members of the Airbus family.
Dimension Comparison: Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319
| Dimensions | Airbus A320neo | Airbus A319neo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Length | 37.57 m | 33.84 m |
| Cabin Length | 27.51 m | 23.78 m |
| Fuselage Width | 3.95 m | 3.95 m |
| Max Cabin Width | 3.70 m | 3.70 m |
| Wing Span (Geometric) | 35.80 m | 35.80 m |
| Height | 11.76 m | 11.76 m |
| Track | 7.59 m | 7.59 m |
| Wheelbase | 12.64 m | 11.04 m |
When we talk about the sizes of airplanes, the Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319 have some differences that suit different needs. The A320neo is bigger overall, with a longer body and more space inside, making it great for longer flights and more passengers. On the flip side, the A319neo is a bit smaller, making it flexible for airlines that need to fly on routes with specific length and space requirements. Even though they have these size differences, both planes share similar features like fuselage width, cabin width, wing span, height, and track. This makes them good options for airlines looking for efficient and adaptable planes for their fleets.
Performance Comparison : Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319
| Performance | Airbus A319neo | Airbus A320neo |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 6,850 km | 6,300 km |
| Maximum Mach Number (Mmo) | M0.82 | M0.82 |
| Max Ramp Weight | 75.90 tonnes | 79.40 tonnes |
| Max Take-off Weight | 75.50 tonnes | 79.00 tonnes |
| Max Landing Weight | 63.90 tonnes | 67.40 tonnes |
| Max Zero Fuel Weight | 60.30 tonnes | 64.30 tonnes |
| Max Fuel Capacity | 26,730 litres | 26,730 litres |
In simple terms, when we compare the Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319, the A319neo can cover a longer distance of 6,850 km compared to the A320neo’s range of 6,300 km. Both planes share the same maximum speed (M0.82), but the A320neo has a higher maximum weight for take-off, landing, ramp, and zero fuel, allowing it to carry more weight. However, both aircraft have the same fuel capacity, enabling them to go the distance efficiently.
Seating and Cargo Comparison: Airbus A319 vs A320
| Specifications | Airbus A319 | Airbus A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Pax Max Seating | 160 | 194 |
| Typical Seating (2-class) | 120-150 | 150-180 |
| Cargo D3 Capacity Underfloor | 4 LD3-45W + 2.3 m³ Bulk | 7 LD3-45W |
| Max Pallet Number Underfloor | 4 | 7 |
| Water Volume | 32 m³ | 44 m³ |
In simple terms, comparing the Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319 in terms of seating and cargo, the A320 is larger and can accommodate more passengers. The A320 has a maximum seating capacity of 194, while the A319 can seat up to 160 passengers. Additionally, the A320 offers a higher typical seating range in a two-class configuration, accommodating between 150 to 180 passengers, compared to the A319’s range of 120 to 150. In terms of cargo, the A320 also outperforms the A319 with a larger underfloor capacity for LD3 containers (7 compared to 4), providing more flexibility for cargo transportation.
Price Comparison: Airbus A320 vs Airbus A319
| Aircraft Model | Basic Price (in million US dollars) |
|---|---|
| Airbus A319neo | $101.5 million |
| Airbus A320neo | $110.6 million |
| Airbus A319ceo | $90 million |
| Airbus A320ceo | $101 million |
In terms of pricing, the Airbus A319neo is listed at $101.5 million, while the Airbus A320neo has a slightly higher basic price of $110.6 million. These prices represent the starting point for negotiations, as actual costs can vary based on factors such as customer-specific configurations, optional features, and bulk purchase agreements. It’s important for airlines to carefully consider their budget, operational requirements, and passenger capacity needs when deciding between the A319neo and A320neo, ensuring a balanced investment that aligns with their business strategy.
Conclusion
In summary, the Airbus A319 and Airbus A320 series offer airlines versatile choices. The A319, compact and accommodating up to 160 passengers, suits routes with specific space requirements. Conversely, the larger A320, with a capacity of up to 194 passengers, caters to airlines with higher demand. The introduction of neo variants brings modern advancements in fuel efficiency. Priced at $101.5 million, the A319neo, and the slightly higher $110.6 million A320neo, provide enhanced capacity and range. Airlines decide based on operational needs, passenger demand, and budget, making both aircraft valuable in aviation.
FaQs
What is the primary difference between the Airbus A319 and Airbus A320?
The main difference lies in size and seating capacity. The A319 is more compact, accommodating up to 160 passengers, while the A320 is larger with a capacity of up to 194 passengers.
What is the significance of “neo” in A319neo and A320neo?
“neo” stands for “New Engine Option.” These variants feature more advanced and fuel-efficient engines, contributing to improved performance and environmental benefits.
How does pricing differ between the A320 vs A319?
The A319neo is priced at $101.5 million, while the A320neo has a slightly higher cost at $110.6 million. Prices can vary based on configurations and additional features.
Are the A319 and A320 suitable for long-haul flights?
While both aircraft are primarily designed for short to medium-haul flights, certain versions like the A320LR (Long Range) offer extended capabilities for longer routes.
How do the A319neo and A320neo contribute to fuel efficiency?
The “neo” variants introduce modern advancements, including fuel-efficient engines and aerodynamic improvements, resulting in reduced fuel consumption and lower environmental impact.
How does cockpit commonality benefit airlines operating both A319 and A320 aircraft?
Cockpit commonality allows pilots to be qualified to fly both A319 and A320 aircraft, reducing training, maintenance, and operational costs for airlines operating mixed fleets.
